英文摘要：
The principle of relativation, that is the law of physics, should the same as viewed from any inertial frame, was popularized by H.Poincarè, the Lorentz transformation(LT) embody that principle, when H.Lorentz adopted them for his own theory of relativity, first published in 1904 in an ether existence. In 1905, A.Einstein published his famous paper, that the speed of light will be locally the same for all observers regardless or their own state of motion, this did away with the need of ether, i.e. a preferred frame of reference. The ensuring years saw much discussion of whether nature was more like Einstein's special relativity(SR) or modified-theory of Lorentz (MOL), the principal differences between the two relativity theories stem from the equivalence of all inertial frames in SR, and the existence of a preferred frame in MOL. From the more discussions of view, SR is logically inconsistent, also does not have sure experimental evidence. Therefore. in 1985 the famous scientist of CERN, John Bell said:"I hope return the states before Einstein. i.e. return to Poincarè and Lorentz". This situation means that the SR is wrong.
Now, we must re-examine the definition of simultancity proposed by Einstein in 1905, it based upon the postulate of the light speed constancy——when the light signal from position A propagate to position B, and soon back to A, the relation of time is - = - ……But in the year 2009, LIN Jin et.al. published an article for the crucial experiment in order to checking Einstein's postulate of the light speed constancy. It was performed at the high precision TWSTT (Two Way Satellite Time Transfer) facility of the National Time Service Center,Chinese Academy of Sciences. By comparison the measurement mechanisms of one way light signal simultancity and"to-and-fro"two way light signal simultancity, the principle of the crucial experiment has proved: if there exists relative motion, the"uplink"and "downlink" light signal passage times of the"to-and-fro" two way light signal are not equal, so that - ≠ - . By means of space technology, Prof. LIN was proved that the theory of light speed constancy is wrong.
The SR is based on the logical foundation of relativtism, so it will lead to violate the principles and contraction. Various paradoxes have been raised to question the consistency of SR, the most famous one is the twin paradox by P.Langevin in 1911.
In this paper, we critice the time-space integration. The theory of relativity is based entirely on the unique concept of space-time, but what does this space-time mean? In fact, people do not really understand space-time. Minkowski proposed the concept of a four-dimensional vector, which adds time to the three-dimensional space as a whole. This treatment has certain advantages in mathematical expression, but it violates physical reality. Space-time does not exist in metrology and SI system, and space-time does not have measurable characteristics. It is a lack of rationality to artificially construct a new parameter with different dimensions of physical quantity. Adding a space vector to a time vector is virtually impossible and meaningless! Fundamentally speaking, time and space should not be mixed up together.
For these reasons, we believe that the special relativity of Einstein is not correct.
|